(305) 416-3180

Alex Sanchez Parraga, ESQ

Vector 14
  • Miami, FL
  • Melville, NY
  • Rochester, NY
  • Tarrytown, NY
  • Jersey City, NJ
  • Cherry Hill, NJ
  • Los Angeles, CA
  • Newport Beach, CA
  • San Diego, CA
  • San Francisco, CA
  • Dallas, TX

Office Address

  • 1221 Brickell Avenue
    19th Floor
    Miami, FL 33131

Alex Sanchez Parraga, ESQ

Partner

Professional Experience

Mr. Sanchez Parraga is a partner at Lydecker’s Miami, New Jersey, New York, and Los Angeles offices. He is an experienced insurance and commercial litigation attorney whose practice focuses on first-party and third-party property coverage and related litigation. He advises domestic and international insurers on complex coverage issues arising from a broad range of construction and property losses, including those caused by hurricanes, fires, hailstorms, structural failures, and other catastrophic events.

Mr. Parraga regularly acts as both coverage and litigation counsel, with experience representing insurers in high-exposure claims involving commercial buildings, residential developments, hospitality properties, and industrial sites. He is well-versed in policy interpretation, claim assessment, and the application of exclusions and endorsements, and is familiar with insurer reporting obligations and litigation management protocols.

He understands the financial, reputational, and operational pressures faced by insurers and their insureds in the wake of significant property losses. Whether handling claims involving large commercial assets or navigating disputes tied to policyholder obligations, Mr. Parraga offers practical, tailored advice aimed at achieving efficient and favorable outcomes.

In addition to his broad insurance coverage practice, Mr. Sanchez Parraga has developed substantial experience handling Directors & Officers (D&O) insurance claims, particularly in the context of condominium litigation. He regularly represents boards, associations, and insurers in matters involving governance disputes, alleged breaches of fiduciary duty, and complex coverage issues. His work in this area combines strategic counsel on D&O risk management with effective litigation defense.

Mr. Sanchez Parraga routinely collaborates with trial attorneys to enhance case strategies, ensuring that issues are preserved for appeal and maximizing the potential for favorable outcomes. His analytical skills enable him to foresee potential challenges and craft strategic solutions, ensuring that every pleading, motion and brief is meticulously prepared and delivered.

Mr. Sanchez Parraga is admitted to practice in Florida, New York, New Jersey, California, Texas, and Georgia.

Mr. Sanchez Parraga earned a Bachelor in Law, with honors, from the University of Barcelona, and received his Juris Doctorate magna cum laude from Nova Southeastern University in 2018. He is admitted to practice law in Florida, New York, New Jersey, and California as well as in the United States District Courts for the Middle and Southern District of Florida.

Education

  • Nova Southeastern University Shepard Broad College of Law (J.D. magna cum laude, 2018)
  • University of Barcelona (J.D. 2016)

Bar and Court Admissions

  • New Jersey
  • New York
  • California
  • Florida
  • Texas
  • Georgia

Notable Publications

  • Restoration Genie, Inc. v. Citizens Prop. Ins. Corp., 4D2023-2587 (Fla. 4th DCA 2024) (affirming the carrier’s motion to dismiss following the contractor’s allegations attempting to disregard the provisions of section 627.7152).
  • Napiche 1961, LLC v. Citizens Prop. Ins. Corp., No. 3D23-2104, 2024 WL 3881539 (Fla. 3rd DCA 2024) (affirming summary judgment finding the insured failed to provide prompt notice of their Hurricane Irma claim).
  • Armando Lopez-Calleja v. Citizens Prop. Ins. Corp., 3D2024-0226 (Fla. 3rd DCA 2024) (obtained appellant’s dismissal of the appeal following the filing of a motion to dismiss).
  • Projekt Property Restoration v. Citizens Prop. Ins. Corp., 3D2023-1581 (Fla. 3rd DCA 2024) (granting the carrier’s motion to dismiss the appeal following an untimely notice to appeal).
  • Affordable Inspection Services v. Citizens Prop. Ins. Corp., 3D2023-1977 (Fla. 3rd DCA 2024) (granting the carrier’s motion to dismiss the appeal challenging the court’s jurisdiction).
  • Boris Munoz v. Citizens Prop. Ins. Corp. v. Dasaro Enter., Inc., 4D2022-3233 (Fla. 4th DCA 2023) (obtaining dismissal of the appeal following the insured’s failure to comply with appellate procedural rules).
  • Black Diamond Funding Ventures v. First Protective Ins. Co., 352 So. 3d 1283 (Fla. 3rd DCA 2023) (affirming dismissal of complaint with prejudice where assignment failed to comply with section 627.7152).
  • Medardo Monterrey v. Citizens Prop. Ins. Corp. v. Dasaro Enter., Inc., 4D2022-3233 (Fla. 4th DCA 2023) (obtaining dismissal of the appeal and appellate attorney’s fees due to the insured’s failure to comply with appellate procedural rules).
  • Citizens Prop. Ins. Corp. v. Dasaro Enter., Inc., 342 So. 3d 277 (Fla. 3rd DCA 2022) (reversing trial order awarding damages to assignee in excess of the $3,000 policy limit).
  • Boris Pedrasa v. Certain Underwriters At Lloyd’s, London Subscribing to Policy Number HOACG161331, 2021 WL 9696583, 1:21-cv-23477-MGC (S.D. Fla. 2021) (obtained order dismissing bad faith lawsuit due to deficiencies in the Civil Remedy Notice).
  • Yako Restoration Grp. Corp. v. Citizens Prop. Ins. Corp., 328 So. 3d 984 (Fla. 3rd DCA 2021) (affirming a summary judgment holding an assignee was required to participate in appraisal under the policy).
  • Pride Clean Restoration, Inc. v. Citizens Prop. Ins. Corp., 317 So. 3d 1274 (Fla. 3rd DCA 2021) (affirming a summary judgment holding an assignee’s recovery was limited to the $3,000 sublimit in the policy).
  • Citizens Prop. Ins. Corp. v. JD Restoration, Inc., 331 So. 3d 197 (Fla. 4th DCA 2021) (reversing an order granting damages to a mitigation company without proper due process to the carrier).
  • 21st Mortg. Corp. v. Citizens Prop. Ins. Corp., 312 So. 3d 484 (Fla. 4th DCA 2021) (affirming summary judgment finding that a mortgagee was not entitled to insurance proceeds under the borrower’s policy).
  • The Plumbing Professionals v. National Specialty Insurance Company, CACE19-010109 Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County (2020) (obtained a summary judgment enforcing a $10,000 limited water damage endorsement).
  • Torrecillas v. Citizens Prop. Ins. Corp., 304 So. 3d 332 (Fla. 2nd DCA 2020) (affirming summary judgment granted following the insured’s failure to attend his examination under oath).